When PEFT Works or Fails
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) is most effective when your downstream task is similar to the pretraining data—such as classification or regression on related datasets—because the pretrained model already contains much of the required knowledge. When the domain shift is small and the task uses learned representations, PEFT can adapt the model with minimal parameter updates.
PEFT is limited when you need to update embeddings (for new vocabulary or very different inputs), or if the downstream task requires a different model architecture. Large distributional drift or major changes in data can also cause PEFT to fail, as its update capacity is restricted. Low-rank adapters or bottlenecked update mechanisms may underfit on complex tasks due to limited expressiveness.
Compared to full fine-tuning, which updates all parameters for maximum flexibility, and zero-shot use, which makes no adaptation, PEFT offers a balance: some adaptation with fewer trainable parameters. This improves efficiency but reduces expressive power. Always evaluate your task and data to decide if PEFT is appropriate.
Дякуємо за ваш відгук!
Запитати АІ
Запитати АІ
Запитайте про що завгодно або спробуйте одне із запропонованих запитань, щоб почати наш чат
Can you give examples of tasks where PEFT works well?
What are some alternatives to PEFT for large domain shifts?
How do I decide between PEFT and full fine-tuning for my project?
Чудово!
Completion показник покращився до 11.11
When PEFT Works or Fails
Свайпніть щоб показати меню
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) is most effective when your downstream task is similar to the pretraining data—such as classification or regression on related datasets—because the pretrained model already contains much of the required knowledge. When the domain shift is small and the task uses learned representations, PEFT can adapt the model with minimal parameter updates.
PEFT is limited when you need to update embeddings (for new vocabulary or very different inputs), or if the downstream task requires a different model architecture. Large distributional drift or major changes in data can also cause PEFT to fail, as its update capacity is restricted. Low-rank adapters or bottlenecked update mechanisms may underfit on complex tasks due to limited expressiveness.
Compared to full fine-tuning, which updates all parameters for maximum flexibility, and zero-shot use, which makes no adaptation, PEFT offers a balance: some adaptation with fewer trainable parameters. This improves efficiency but reduces expressive power. Always evaluate your task and data to decide if PEFT is appropriate.
Дякуємо за ваш відгук!