Notice: This page requires JavaScript to function properly.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings or update your browser.
Lära Rebase for a Clean History | Collaborating with Upstream
Practice
Projects
Quizzes & Challenges
Quizzes
Challenges
/
Git for Open Source Contributors

bookRebase for a Clean History

When collaborating on open source projects, you often need to keep your feature branch up to date with the latest changes from the main project repository, also called "upstream." One of the best ways to do this is by using rebasing. Rebasing rewrites your branch’s history so that your commits appear as if they were made on top of the latest upstream changes. This makes the project history linear and much easier to follow, which is highly valued in open source collaboration.

A linear history has several advantages:

  • It makes it easier for reviewers to understand the sequence of changes;
  • It reduces the chance of complex merge conflicts later on;
  • It keeps the project’s commit log clean and readable.

By rebasing, you are replaying your commits on top of the latest upstream branch, rather than merging the upstream branch into your feature branch, which can create unnecessary merge commits and a tangled history.

123
# To rebase your current feature branch onto the latest upstream main branch: git fetch upstream git rebase upstream/main
copy

During a rebase, you may encounter conflicts if your changes and the upstream changes modify the same lines in a file. When this happens, Git will pause the rebase and mark the files with conflicts. You need to open each conflicted file, look for the conflict markers, and edit the file to resolve the differences. After fixing the conflicts, you stage the resolved files with git add, then continue the rebase process with git rebase --continue. If you want to abort the rebase and return to your previous branch state, use git rebase --abort. Resolving conflicts as you rebase helps ensure your branch can be merged cleanly into the main project.

question mark

What is a primary benefit of using git rebase instead of git merge when updating your feature branch?

Select the correct answer

Var allt tydligt?

Hur kan vi förbättra det?

Tack för dina kommentarer!

Avsnitt 2. Kapitel 2

Fråga AI

expand

Fråga AI

ChatGPT

Fråga vad du vill eller prova någon av de föreslagna frågorna för att starta vårt samtal

bookRebase for a Clean History

Svep för att visa menyn

When collaborating on open source projects, you often need to keep your feature branch up to date with the latest changes from the main project repository, also called "upstream." One of the best ways to do this is by using rebasing. Rebasing rewrites your branch’s history so that your commits appear as if they were made on top of the latest upstream changes. This makes the project history linear and much easier to follow, which is highly valued in open source collaboration.

A linear history has several advantages:

  • It makes it easier for reviewers to understand the sequence of changes;
  • It reduces the chance of complex merge conflicts later on;
  • It keeps the project’s commit log clean and readable.

By rebasing, you are replaying your commits on top of the latest upstream branch, rather than merging the upstream branch into your feature branch, which can create unnecessary merge commits and a tangled history.

123
# To rebase your current feature branch onto the latest upstream main branch: git fetch upstream git rebase upstream/main
copy

During a rebase, you may encounter conflicts if your changes and the upstream changes modify the same lines in a file. When this happens, Git will pause the rebase and mark the files with conflicts. You need to open each conflicted file, look for the conflict markers, and edit the file to resolve the differences. After fixing the conflicts, you stage the resolved files with git add, then continue the rebase process with git rebase --continue. If you want to abort the rebase and return to your previous branch state, use git rebase --abort. Resolving conflicts as you rebase helps ensure your branch can be merged cleanly into the main project.

question mark

What is a primary benefit of using git rebase instead of git merge when updating your feature branch?

Select the correct answer

Var allt tydligt?

Hur kan vi förbättra det?

Tack för dina kommentarer!

Avsnitt 2. Kapitel 2
some-alt