Lære Interpretability And Feature Discovery

Sparse autoencoders create latent representations where only a few units are active for each input—this is known as sparsity. Sparsity encourages each neuron in the latent layer to detect specific, distinct patterns in the data, so the learned codes are easier for you to interpret.

For any input, most latent units in a sparse autoencoder remain near zero, while only a few show significant activation. In contrast, dense autoencoders have many active units at once, making it harder to relate each unit to a meaningful input feature.

Sparse representations help you see what each latent unit is "looking for" in the input. In image data, one unit might activate for edges in a certain direction, while another responds to a particular texture. This selectivity improves interpretability and shows how the autoencoder organizes information.

You can see this in the following text-based visualization, which connects sparse activations to specific input patterns.

Input patterns

\text{Input patterns:}\quad \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}

Sparse latent activations

\text{Sparse latent activations:}\quad \begin{bmatrix} 0.9 & 0.0 & 0.0 & 0.2 \\ 0.0 & 0.8 & 0.7 & 0.0 \\ 0.85 & 0.6 & 0.0 & 0.0 \end{bmatrix}

Table for clarity

\begin{array}{c|cccc} \textbf{Pattern} & \textbf{Input}_1 & \textbf{Input}_2 & \textbf{Input}_3 & \textbf{Input}_4 \\ \hline A & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ B & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ C & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array}

\begin{array}{c|cccc} \textbf{Pattern} & \textbf{Lat}_1 & \textbf{Lat}_2 & \textbf{Lat}_3 & \textbf{Lat}_4 \\ \hline A & 0.9 & 0.0 & 0.0 & 0.2 \\ B & 0.0 & 0.8 & 0.7 & 0.0 \\ C & 0.85 & 0.6 & 0.0 & 0.0 \\ \end{array}

In this example, each input pattern activates a distinct set of latent units, and most units remain inactive for each sample. This activation pattern can be described mathematically as follows:

Let $x$ be an input vector and $z = f(x)$ the sparse latent representation, where $f$ is the encoder function. For most entries $z_i$ in $z$ , $z_i \approx 0$ , and only a few $z_j$ have significant values. This sparsity makes it straightforward to associate each nonzero $z_j$ with a specific feature in $x$ .

Such a structure enables you to clearly trace which features in the input are captured by each latent unit, enhancing the interpretability of the learned representations.

Definition

Feature disentanglement in the context of sparse autoencoders refers to the process by which different latent units learn to represent different, independent factors of variation in the data. When features are disentangled, each latent unit captures a specific aspect of the input (such as orientation, color, or shape), making the representation more interpretable and useful for downstream tasks.

1. Why are sparse autoencoders often more interpretable than dense ones?

2. What is feature disentanglement and why is it desirable?

3. Fill in the blank

Alt var klart?

Takk for tilbakemeldingene dine!

Seksjon 3. Kapittel 3

Spør AI

Spør om hva du vil, eller prøv ett av de foreslåtte spørsmålene for å starte chatten vår

Suggested prompts:

Can you explain how sparsity is enforced in a sparse autoencoder?

What are the benefits of using sparse autoencoders compared to dense ones?

Can you give an example of how to interpret these sparse activations in practice?

Sveip for å vise menyen