Notice: This page requires JavaScript to function properly.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings or update your browser.
Lære Why Copying Isn’t Always Efficient | Introduction to Move Semantics
C++ Move Semantics

bookWhy Copying Isn’t Always Efficient

Copying objects in C++ can be expensive, especially when dealing with large resources such as dynamically allocated memory or containers. Each copy operation may involve allocating new memory and duplicating the contents, which can significantly impact performance.

main.cpp

main.cpp

copy
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041
#include <iostream> #include <cstring> class LargeBuffer { public: LargeBuffer(size_t size) : size_(size), data_(new char[size]) { std::cout << "Constructed LargeBuffer of size " << size_ << std::endl; std::memset(data_, 0, size_); } // Expensive copy constructor LargeBuffer(const LargeBuffer& other) : size_(other.size_), data_(new char[other.size_]) { std::cout << "Copied LargeBuffer of size " << size_ << std::endl; std::memcpy(data_, other.data_, size_); } // Destructor ~LargeBuffer() { std::cout << "Destroyed LargeBuffer of size " << size_ << std::endl; delete[] data_; } size_t size() const { return size_; } private: size_t size_; char* data_; }; void processBuffer(LargeBuffer buf) { std::cout << "Processing buffer of size " << buf.size() << std::endl; } int main() { LargeBuffer buf1(1024 * 1024); // 1 MB buffer processBuffer(buf1); // Copies buf1 into the function }

In the example above, notice how copying the object leads to additional memory allocations and data duplication. This inefficiency becomes more pronounced as the size of the resource grows.

Copying is necessary when you need two independent objects with the same state. For example, when you want to preserve the original while modifying the copy.

Move semantics allow you to transfer resources instead of duplicating them, which is especially useful for temporary objects or when ownership can be transferred.

question mark

Why can copying objects in C++ be inefficient, especially for large resources?

Select the correct answer

Alt var klart?

Hvordan kan vi forbedre det?

Takk for tilbakemeldingene dine!

Seksjon 1. Kapittel 1

Spør AI

expand

Spør AI

ChatGPT

Spør om hva du vil, eller prøv ett av de foreslåtte spørsmålene for å starte chatten vår

Suggested prompts:

Can you explain how move semantics work in C++?

What are some best practices for using move semantics?

Can you provide an example comparing copy and move operations?

bookWhy Copying Isn’t Always Efficient

Sveip for å vise menyen

Copying objects in C++ can be expensive, especially when dealing with large resources such as dynamically allocated memory or containers. Each copy operation may involve allocating new memory and duplicating the contents, which can significantly impact performance.

main.cpp

main.cpp

copy
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041
#include <iostream> #include <cstring> class LargeBuffer { public: LargeBuffer(size_t size) : size_(size), data_(new char[size]) { std::cout << "Constructed LargeBuffer of size " << size_ << std::endl; std::memset(data_, 0, size_); } // Expensive copy constructor LargeBuffer(const LargeBuffer& other) : size_(other.size_), data_(new char[other.size_]) { std::cout << "Copied LargeBuffer of size " << size_ << std::endl; std::memcpy(data_, other.data_, size_); } // Destructor ~LargeBuffer() { std::cout << "Destroyed LargeBuffer of size " << size_ << std::endl; delete[] data_; } size_t size() const { return size_; } private: size_t size_; char* data_; }; void processBuffer(LargeBuffer buf) { std::cout << "Processing buffer of size " << buf.size() << std::endl; } int main() { LargeBuffer buf1(1024 * 1024); // 1 MB buffer processBuffer(buf1); // Copies buf1 into the function }

In the example above, notice how copying the object leads to additional memory allocations and data duplication. This inefficiency becomes more pronounced as the size of the resource grows.

Copying is necessary when you need two independent objects with the same state. For example, when you want to preserve the original while modifying the copy.

Move semantics allow you to transfer resources instead of duplicating them, which is especially useful for temporary objects or when ownership can be transferred.

question mark

Why can copying objects in C++ be inefficient, especially for large resources?

Select the correct answer

Alt var klart?

Hvordan kan vi forbedre det?

Takk for tilbakemeldingene dine!

Seksjon 1. Kapittel 1
some-alt