Notice: This page requires JavaScript to function properly.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings or update your browser.
Lernen When PEFT Works or Fails | Theory, Limitations, Deployment
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning

bookWhen PEFT Works or Fails

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) is most effective when your downstream task is similar to the pretraining data—such as classification or regression on related datasets—because the pretrained model already contains much of the required knowledge. When the domain shift is small and the task uses learned representations, PEFT can adapt the model with minimal parameter updates.

PEFT is limited when you need to update embeddings (for new vocabulary or very different inputs), or if the downstream task requires a different model architecture. Large distributional drift or major changes in data can also cause PEFT to fail, as its update capacity is restricted. Low-rank adapters or bottlenecked update mechanisms may underfit on complex tasks due to limited expressiveness.

Compared to full fine-tuning, which updates all parameters for maximum flexibility, and zero-shot use, which makes no adaptation, PEFT offers a balance: some adaptation with fewer trainable parameters. This improves efficiency but reduces expressive power. Always evaluate your task and data to decide if PEFT is appropriate.

question mark

When is parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) most effective?

Select the correct answer

War alles klar?

Wie können wir es verbessern?

Danke für Ihr Feedback!

Abschnitt 3. Kapitel 2

Fragen Sie AI

expand

Fragen Sie AI

ChatGPT

Fragen Sie alles oder probieren Sie eine der vorgeschlagenen Fragen, um unser Gespräch zu beginnen

Suggested prompts:

Can you give examples of tasks where PEFT works well?

What are some alternatives to PEFT for large domain shifts?

How do I decide between PEFT and full fine-tuning for my project?

bookWhen PEFT Works or Fails

Swipe um das Menü anzuzeigen

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) is most effective when your downstream task is similar to the pretraining data—such as classification or regression on related datasets—because the pretrained model already contains much of the required knowledge. When the domain shift is small and the task uses learned representations, PEFT can adapt the model with minimal parameter updates.

PEFT is limited when you need to update embeddings (for new vocabulary or very different inputs), or if the downstream task requires a different model architecture. Large distributional drift or major changes in data can also cause PEFT to fail, as its update capacity is restricted. Low-rank adapters or bottlenecked update mechanisms may underfit on complex tasks due to limited expressiveness.

Compared to full fine-tuning, which updates all parameters for maximum flexibility, and zero-shot use, which makes no adaptation, PEFT offers a balance: some adaptation with fewer trainable parameters. This improves efficiency but reduces expressive power. Always evaluate your task and data to decide if PEFT is appropriate.

question mark

When is parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) most effective?

Select the correct answer

War alles klar?

Wie können wir es verbessern?

Danke für Ihr Feedback!

Abschnitt 3. Kapitel 2
some-alt