Notice: This page requires JavaScript to function properly.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings or update your browser.
Learn When PEFT Works or Fails | Theory, Limitations, Deployment
Practice
Projects
Quizzes & Challenges
Quizzes
Challenges
/
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning

bookWhen PEFT Works or Fails

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) is most effective when your downstream task is similar to the pretraining dataβ€”such as classification or regression on related datasetsβ€”because the pretrained model already contains much of the required knowledge. When the domain shift is small and the task uses learned representations, PEFT can adapt the model with minimal parameter updates.

PEFT is limited when you need to update embeddings (for new vocabulary or very different inputs), or if the downstream task requires a different model architecture. Large distributional drift or major changes in data can also cause PEFT to fail, as its update capacity is restricted. Low-rank adapters or bottlenecked update mechanisms may underfit on complex tasks due to limited expressiveness.

Compared to full fine-tuning, which updates all parameters for maximum flexibility, and zero-shot use, which makes no adaptation, PEFT offers a balance: some adaptation with fewer trainable parameters. This improves efficiency but reduces expressive power. Always evaluate your task and data to decide if PEFT is appropriate.

question mark

When is parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) most effective?

Select the correct answer

Everything was clear?

How can we improve it?

Thanks for your feedback!

SectionΒ 3. ChapterΒ 2

Ask AI

expand

Ask AI

ChatGPT

Ask anything or try one of the suggested questions to begin our chat

Suggested prompts:

Can you give examples of tasks where PEFT works well?

What are some alternatives to PEFT for large domain shifts?

How do I decide between PEFT and full fine-tuning for my project?

bookWhen PEFT Works or Fails

Swipe to show menu

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) is most effective when your downstream task is similar to the pretraining dataβ€”such as classification or regression on related datasetsβ€”because the pretrained model already contains much of the required knowledge. When the domain shift is small and the task uses learned representations, PEFT can adapt the model with minimal parameter updates.

PEFT is limited when you need to update embeddings (for new vocabulary or very different inputs), or if the downstream task requires a different model architecture. Large distributional drift or major changes in data can also cause PEFT to fail, as its update capacity is restricted. Low-rank adapters or bottlenecked update mechanisms may underfit on complex tasks due to limited expressiveness.

Compared to full fine-tuning, which updates all parameters for maximum flexibility, and zero-shot use, which makes no adaptation, PEFT offers a balance: some adaptation with fewer trainable parameters. This improves efficiency but reduces expressive power. Always evaluate your task and data to decide if PEFT is appropriate.

question mark

When is parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) most effective?

Select the correct answer

Everything was clear?

How can we improve it?

Thanks for your feedback!

SectionΒ 3. ChapterΒ 2
some-alt